32-bit float recorders & differences in audio quality

Audio

July 6, 2025

Our sound and lighting courses can be found at https://school.learnlightandsound.com!

In this week’s episode, we discuss the difference in audio quality between budget and higher priced 32-bit float audio recorders.

If you’d like to learn how to make great dialogue audio for your film and video projects, please have a look at my courses including processing dialogue audio in Adobe Audition and DaVinci Resolve/Fairlight, recording sound, how to use the Zoom F4, F6, F8, and F8n, and how to get the most from the Sound Devices MixPre series of recorders. Our latest courses cover Sound for Live Streaming with the ATEM Mini and an Intro to Izotope RX. See https://school.learnlightandsound.com for more info!Support my work creating videos by donating at Ko-Fi.com: http://ko-fi.com/curtisjuddGear used or mentioned in this episode (the links below are Amazon.com, B&H Photo, Sweetwater, or other affiliate links. As an affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases):

Show video transcript

32-bit float recording is genuinely useful — it removes the need to carefully set gain, freeing you to focus on mic placement and managing room noise. But not all 32-bit float recorders produce equally good audio.

Traditional (16/24-bit) recording: a mic converts sound to an analog signal, a preamp applies gain you set manually, and an A/D converter turns it into digital ones and zeros. If you set gain too high and exceed 0 dB full scale, the result clips and distorts, and that damage generally can't be undone afterward, even by reducing levels in post.

32-bit float recording instead uses a fixed, deliberately low preamp gain set by the manufacturer, feeding two or more A/D converters simultaneously — one captures louder/higher-amplitude sound, another captures quieter sound, and the two streams are combined into a wider dynamic-range 32-bit float file. The level fader on most 32-bit float recorders doesn't touch the analog preamp gain at all — it's just doing math on the already-converted digital samples, boosting or attenuating every sample, which means it also boosts the noise floor along with the signal. High-quality recorders use clean enough preamps that this isn't very costly.

The apparent "magic": if your recorded level actually exceeds 0 dB in the file, you can often bring it into post and reduce it, restoring a non-clipped result in most (not all) cases; similarly, very quiet recordings can often be boosted without raising the noise floor as much as with traditional 24/16-bit recording. But this only works well when every part of the signal chain — mic, preamp, converters, and the recombination process — is high quality. Weak links anywhere in that chain degrade the result, just like with traditional recorders.

Two examples: the Zoom H4 Essential ($200, purchased with my own money) does recover clipped-sounding recordings reasonably well when reduced in post, but boosting quiet dialogue tends to raise the noise floor noticeably — likely a preamp quality issue rather than a fundamental flaw of 32-bit float itself (32-bit float recordings are NOT inherently noise-free, despite a common myth). The Tascam DR-07XP, likely using a single A/D converter and lower-quality preamp/mic combination, shows similar noisiness when boosted — detailed samples are linked in reviews of both recorders.

Bottom line: even in the 32-bit float world, you still get what you pay for — the format alone doesn't guarantee pristine, noise-free audio. For casual hobbyist content, budget recorders may be perfectly adequate. If you're evaluating a recorder, listen to unprocessed samples (no noise reduction, no heavy compression/loudness normalization, and with YouTube's "stable volume" feature turned off) across several models before deciding — generally, spending more (Zoom F-series, Sound Devices MixPre) gets you a cleaner-sounding recorder than budget options like the Zoom H4 Essential or DR-07XP. Get out there, make some great sound, and we'll talk to you again soon.